[[ Read Best ]] Physics for Future Presidents: The Science Behind the HeadlinesAuthor Richard A. Muller – Circuitwiringdiagram.co

Hmmmlook at the title Maybe the word Future should be changed to include and Current I m just say n.Everything that is in the news today from nuclear bombs, to alternative energy sources, to global warming is succinctly covered in layman s language I used my Kindle to mark some text that I thought was interesting and wanted to share First regarding nuclear weapons, small amounts of radioactivity have such small consequences that they could properly be ignored Radiological weapons ar Hmmmlook at the title Maybe the word Future should be changed to include and Current I m just say n.Everything that is in the news today from nuclear bombs, to alternative energy sources, to global warming is succinctly covered in layman s language I used my Kindle to mark some text that I thought was interesting and wanted to share First regarding nuclear weapons, small amounts of radioactivity have such small consequences that they could properly be ignored Radiological weapons are not the threat that many seem to fear Second regarding global warming, New Orleans was not struck by a category 4 or 5 storm the number of these category storms hitting the US have not increased, like the global warming folks would have you believe , and any category 3 storm that hit the city in the past 50 years could equally well have destroyed the city The book is filled with examples such as this that run counter intuitive to what the public has been led to believe It will absolutely open your eyes and you will view news stories in a new light.Finally, the author doesn t leave you hanging he puts up his ideas to implement if he were president with conservation of resources leading the way Being president is not easy but having an understanding of the physics regarding some of the tough issues you d face could make your job that much easier The Physics for Future PresidentsIt is a fascinating book using science to explain and sometimes solve today s major problems Estimating future types of terrorist attacks can be calculated by knowing how destructive each potential weapon is The surprising answer is that gasoline not smart nuclear bombs are their weapon of choice.Do you want to know how to bring down oil prices The answer is to make oil from coal Coal is our countries most abundant natural resource The reason why we do not The Physics for Future PresidentsIt is a fascinating book using science to explain and sometimes solve today s major problems Estimating future types of terrorist attacks can be calculated by knowing how destructive each potential weapon is The surprising answer is that gasoline not smart nuclear bombs are their weapon of choice.Do you want to know how to bring down oil prices The answer is to make oil from coal Coal is our countries most abundant natural resource The reason why we do not do it is because it is costly to build a coal to oil plant And when OPEC finds out they immediately drop the price of oil and as a result we switch back to OPEC oil immediately Is solar power the solution No Is nuclear power a good option Yes The reasons are presented by the author Nuclear power and nuclear weapons are explained in detail Satellites and Rocket Science also have detailed explanations Global warming is presented in an interesting fashion He alludes to his belief in it in the early chapters But when we get to his section Global Warming he gives us a chapter called Evidence where he dismisses a host of global warming proving science as distortion and exaggeration He goes as far as stating that Al Gore s Inconvenient Truth is propaganda He does however state that he believes that global warming is happening and that human activity is likely the cause But points out that America produce noCO2 than most of Europe The real CO2 culprits are India and China Conservation seems to be his global warming solution For example he says that there are cool colors that can be used for roof paint that would cool the house below He also explains why ethanol will not solve the oil crises but butanol made from miscanthus could solve it For anyone interested in the major issues challenging us today this book is a must read Leaving aside the counsel to a potential president conceit which wears out its welcome remarkably early in this egress into scientific realism from a sober and commonsensical physics professor, Muller provides a healthy splash of Chill the fuck out and take another bite of this here Clue Burger, y all a bunch of Chicken Little motherfuckers The sky ain t necessarily falling, and there s no need to be crying your pretty little eyes out that it is, chump change water over a bunch of thickly and p Leaving aside the counsel to a potential president conceit which wears out its welcome remarkably early in this egress into scientific realism from a sober and commonsensical physics professor, Muller provides a healthy splash of Chill the fuck out and take another bite of this here Clue Burger, y all a bunch of Chicken Little motherfuckers The sky ain t necessarily falling, and there s no need to be crying your pretty little eyes out that it is, chump change water over a bunch of thickly and pungently smoking brushfires that have broken out within various topical communities across the globe terrorism, nuclear and biological weaponry, nuclear and non renewable energy, global warming, and the potential of space exploration and utilization with a linked refrain that shrill ideology and piercing alarmism, ofttimes paired with or stemming from shallow or selective knowledge of the matter in hand, seldom work to produce effective and enduring results, no matter the direction in which your political compass might point In some cases they are still left smoldering indeed, cannot be put completely out but the air seems clearer and smells haler, the horizon starkly creased with all of that smoky plumage impressively and appreciably abated This was a fascinating book to read, and I really enjoyed it Dr Muller examines many of the science issues we hear about increasingly today, and also debunks much of the junk science and media sensationalism that have had a deleterious effect on public policies often purporting to be based on science The friend of mine who loaned this book to me to read warned me that Dr Muller was somewhat liberal , but, honestly, I did not see any deliberate bias in his analyses and explanation of the sci This was a fascinating book to read, and I really enjoyed it Dr Muller examines many of the science issues we hear about increasingly today, and also debunks much of the junk science and media sensationalism that have had a deleterious effect on public policies often purporting to be based on science The friend of mine who loaned this book to me to read warned me that Dr Muller was somewhat liberal , but, honestly, I did not see any deliberate bias in his analyses and explanation of the science issues of our day He is a believer in global warming, and, if I do have one criticism of his book, it is that he hangs his hat greatly in the last part of this book on the IPCC reports on climate change although this body s predictions have been much criticized lately and although this body does not do its own research and has, on some occasions, used materials that have not been peer reviewed aka so called grey literature However, this does not mar the overall worth of this book It is interesting, fascinating, and a pleasure to read I recommend this to anyone with an interest or a love of science This book is hands down the most important book anyone can read this year If I had the money, I would buy a copy for every person I know it s that good The book discusses the science behind topics that would be critical to any presidency terrorism, the fuel situation, nuclear bombs and other related topics, global warming, alternative energy and.What I really like about the book is that it s politics free Liberals and conservatives alike stand to learn a lot about themselves and the This book is hands down the most important book anyone can read this year If I had the money, I would buy a copy for every person I know it s that good The book discusses the science behind topics that would be critical to any presidency terrorism, the fuel situation, nuclear bombs and other related topics, global warming, alternative energy and.What I really like about the book is that it s politics free Liberals and conservatives alike stand to learn a lot about themselves and the arguments they make by reading this book And it s based entirely on science There s no spin, no hype, no agenda the book is so refreshing to read after all those talking head books put out by both the left and the right.Anyone who will be voting this November needs to do themselves a favor and read this book from start to finish This book is a must read for anyone interested in the current issues of global warming, energy or terrorism It outlines the reality of the science and its impact on these issues in the public realm I found it very informative and helpful to be able to follow these issues and determine what my stand is and what course I feel our country ought to take It also helps to not be easily misled by varying reports. Pretty much everyone should read this, regardless of the presence or absence of designs on the highest office in the land If you, you know, read the news or vote or anything like that, this book is for you Not only is it incredibly helpful in contextualizing some of the science related policy debates currently being waged, it s also just fascinating stuff for example, the reason plutonium bombs are round and uranium bombs are cylindrical, or the fact that a square yard of sunlight delivers ab Pretty much everyone should read this, regardless of the presence or absence of designs on the highest office in the land If you, you know, read the news or vote or anything like that, this book is for you Not only is it incredibly helpful in contextualizing some of the science related policy debates currently being waged, it s also just fascinating stuff for example, the reason plutonium bombs are round and uranium bombs are cylindrical, or the fact that a square yard of sunlight delivers about a horsepower when it hits the ground And all the complicated math is hidden in the end notes, so you don t even have to pay attention to that if it s not your bag.By the way, I hereby state, and mean all that I say, that I never have been and never will be a candidate for President that if nominated by either party, I should peremptorily decline and even if unanimously elected I should decline to serve What didn t I learn from this book I d go ahead and list everything that I did but to do so would be to simply paraphrase the wonderfully concise and informative Executive Summaries a the end of each chapter What a fantastic idea of Muller s that a future President must be aware of a number of basic, scientific principles that he can then use to help shape and guide his agenda While he admitedly so gets a little personal with regards to the use of nuclear power in the States, for the most pa What didn t I learn from this book I d go ahead and list everything that I did but to do so would be to simply paraphrase the wonderfully concise and informative Executive Summaries a the end of each chapter What a fantastic idea of Muller s that a future President must be aware of a number of basic, scientific principles that he can then use to help shape and guide his agenda While he admitedly so gets a little personal with regards to the use of nuclear power in the States, for the most part, Muller stays politically neutral as he presents the facts about the physics behind the most pressing problems that a future president is likely to face.From terrorirsm to nukes, global warming to space, all scientifically relevant topics are covered To top it off, Muller declares that the majority of equations and formulas used to arrive at the conclusions he makes are rather irrelevant for a future president as that is why he hires staffers Thus, the majority of the book presents the conceptual, theoretical and demonstrable physics behind the these pressing political, and of course, scientific, issues.A fun read for anyone with an interest in science, politics or simply current events as the conclusions drawn by Muller are likely those that will guide public policy in the very near future As for future presidents, well, it s obviously a must read If only a specialist in every field could do this Imagine where we d be right now if someone had written Economics for Future Presidents.think about it The conceit of this book is, obviously, that it s addressed to whoever would win the Obama McCain race here are the bits of physics you need to understand if you re going to make the right decisions on terrorism, energy, nukes both weapons and reactors , space and global warming There s plenty of good stuff here as well as lots of fascinating facts that I m sure I ll find myself tossing oh so casually into dinner party conversations The text is extremely readable, bouncing along at an exhila The conceit of this book is, obviously, that it s addressed to whoever would win the Obama McCain race here are the bits of physics you need to understand if you re going to make the right decisions on terrorism, energy, nukes both weapons and reactors , space and global warming There s plenty of good stuff here as well as lots of fascinating facts that I m sure I ll find myself tossing oh so casually into dinner party conversations The text is extremely readable, bouncing along at an exhilarating pace But there are also some silly mistakes In the Manhattan Project, the scientists initially estimated that the amount needed for a critical mass was about 440 pounds With a tamper, instead of leaking out, the neutrons are reflected back in, so the critical mass needed for an explosion dropped by about a factor four, down to only 33 pounds p129 I ve tried and I ve tried and I ve tried to make sense of that factor of four calculation, but I still can t get no satisfaction The 440 pounds is clearly a euphemism for 200kg, and I assume 33 pounds is, in plain English, 15kgbut even looking at these somewhat easier to work with numbers, hoping for some sort of four related relationship between them, I can t imagine what he was talking about Similarly here In 1974, the average refrigerator size in the United States had a volume of 18 cubic feet, and the energy it used was 1800 kilowatt hours per year That s 130 kilowatt hours for each cubic foot p315 If I divide 1800 by 18, I get 100, not 130 I ve checked my calculation every which way, and I still think I m right on this.I have other concerns In the long chapter on global warming, Muller adopts the position of being, not a climate change denier, but a denier of the need for draconian actionand he claims to produce the physics to support this He obviously has a beef about Al Gore and the movie An Inconvenient Truth, because he loses no opportunity to carp at them, even in instances where quite clearly Gore s error was that the science he presented, while perfectly correct as of 2004, has since been amended Perhaps Gore once farted in front of Muller s wife, or something Even so, I was prepared to be educated on the subject, but thenwell, what s this On page 283 we have a couple of diagrams credited to Pielke Landsea On p294 there s an approving mention of a correction to the climatologists physics from Steve McIntyre and Ross McKitrick The diagrams seem plausible and the correction to the physics may be fine for all I know, but nowhere is there a mention of the fact that Pielke, McIntyre and McKitrick are extremely controversial figures in the climate debate, being champions of the AGW denialist movement I for one would trust nothing emanating from any of these three until I had it confirmed in triplicate by independent authorities, and even then I d be dubious Yet Muller, who must have known that to much of his audience the names will mean nothing, fails to alert his readers to the fact that the arguments being produced in general on AGW by Pielke, McIntyre and McKitrick and, again for all I know, Landsea are, to euphemize, not universally accepted.Similarly, on pp104 105 Muller discusses the estimated death toll from long term cancers in the wake of the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, and tells us that the IAEA UN best estimate for this number is 4000 I was surprised the figure was so low, since I was sure I d heard of higher ones, but who was I to argue with the IAEA UN It was only by chance, in casual e conversation with a friend a couple of days later, that I discovered there have been several estimates of this death toll, and the IAEA UN one is controversial Many of the other estimates, quick research revealed, have reliability problems of their own I mean, I love Greenpeace and have given them money, but they re an advocacy group and everyone knows you take with a pinch of salt the statistics produced by advocacy groups and it s quite possible the IAEA UN estimate may be the best but, for the sake of honesty, Muller should have indicated the existence of these other, farpessimistic estimates.The laffaloud irony is that, elsewhere, he s really quite strong about people who cherry pick their information.All in all, then, having found a few instances where I did not feel Muller was dealing fairly with his readers, I became uncertain as to how much of the rest of his text I could trust And that s a pity, because I very much enjoyed the actual process of reading the book A marvelously readable and level headed explanation of basic science and how it relates to the issues John Tierney, New York TimesThis is must have information for all presidents and citizens of the twenty first century Is Iran s nascent nuclear capability a genuine threat to the West Are biochemical weapons likely to be developed by terrorists Are there viable alternatives to fossil fuels that should be nurtured and supported by the government Should nuclear power be encouraged Can global warming be stopped